🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision over how to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.